Although not intended to show classroom pilots how to release “chemicals” into the atmosphere, the “Chemtrails” manual provides indoctrination and teaches the essentials of atmospheric chemistry as basis for carrying out operations to engineer the climate.
Congress, the FAA, EPA, NASA, NOAA, NWS and FAKE NEWS are responsible for providing the “Deep State” coverup in the usual interests of “National Security”, despite conclusive evidence published by non-governmental and non-University connected researchers like Cliff Carnicom at the Carnicom Institute
After all, admitting to a secret program of altering the climate would endanger the entire IPCC political agenda of Global Warming/Climate Change and cause essential scientific papers that support the theory of CO2 causation for Global Warming/Climate Change to be
View original post 1,612 more words
Thank you Scott for this research.
by Scott Creighton
Back in May of this year, Moon Jae-in won a presidential election in South Korea and took office. He campaigned on the radical idea that maybe the people of his nation would be better off if they normalized relations with the government of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK or “North Korea” and pursued the Sunshine Policy the previous corrupt president of South Korea turned her back on at the behest of America and her “national interests”
The previous corrupt president was kicked out of office for being corrupt but before she left she cut a deal to stick another THAAD missile defense system in her country, a deal that promised HUGE profits for Lockheed Martin, the company that manufactures them.
View original post 1,233 more words
Another well researched article from Richard Edmondson. ❤️
Corporate profiteers, medical bills that bankrupt families, vaccine injuries, misery & death…what’s not to like?
By Richard Edmondson
I finally got around to watching the documentary “Vaxxed.” It’s available here on Vimeo. A charge of $3.99 gets you access to it for 48 hours, and it’s well worth the money.
View original post 4,131 more words
Many thanks to Richard Edmondson for this extensive research.
“At the first foreign conferences where Soviet diplomats participated, in Genoa and at The Hague (1922), it could not remain hidden from Europe that the Soviet diplomats and their assistants consisted to a large extent of Jews.”
August 3 marks the ninth anniversary of the death of famed Russian author Alexander Solzhenitsyn. Among his many books, perhaps the most famous is The Gulag Archipelago, published in 1973. It provides a close-up look at the old Soviet system of forced labor camps and includes the author’s own firsthand observations.
View original post 2,493 more words
(This is an edited version of an article originally published at The Council of European Canadians)
To most Westerners today, the words ‘nation’, ‘nationality’ and ‘law’ seem only to mean the state, citizenship, and legislation enacted by the state. But there are other meanings to these words, which were their primary and even sole meanings in the past. The nation was once the ethnic group, the tribe at large — nationality being one’s ethnicity. Likewise, the law was once the customs of the kin-group; in Europe. So how is it that kinship is ignored by Western states as the criteria for citizenship? And is there a future for the original understanding of these words?
Ricardo Duchesne points out that the rise of Western nation-states, including the US, was not based on civic nationalism, noting their ‘White-only’ immigration policies. He writes,
The nations of Europe were not mere “inventions”…
View original post 914 more words
WESTERN VALUES™. I am weary of supposedly independent international surveys in which Russia is always near the bottom. At last Denis Churilov has taken the trouble and effort to consider the methodology and “independence” of one of them. Specifically the Press Freedom Index from Reporters Without Borders. RWB turns out – amazingly enough – to get money from the usual American GONGOs: USAID, NED and, of course, Soros. In short, what they used to call a “front” in the Cold War. Churilov looks at the methodology of the rating – selected people, subjective impressions – practically guaranteed to produce the “correct answer”. Then he looks at the answer in which – of course! – Ukraine scores much better than Russia. Churilov then itemises how preposterous this ranking is. These things are part of the propaganda war and should be seen as such.
MAKS. The military airshow is over. Video…
View original post 697 more words